Reporting standards for percutaneous interventions in dialysis access. Technology Assessment Committee.

نویسندگان

  • R J Gray
  • D Sacks
  • L G Martin
  • S O Trerotola
چکیده

THE traditional treatment for failing arteriovenous dialysis access has been thrombectomy and/or surgical revision as needed (1–3). Over the past 2 decades, percutaneous methods for thrombus dissolution and/or correction of anatomic abnormalities have become accepted alternate treatment modalities (4). The results of thrombolysis (5–9), angioplasty (10–14), directional atherectomy (15,16), and endoluminal stent deployment (17–22) have been reported widely; nevertheless, comparison and interpretation of results are difficult because of differing methods of patient selection, treatment, and follow-up. For example, some thrombolysis series report success as establishment of flow immediately after the procedure (5), whereas others require at least three dialysis sessions after treatment for success (8). In addition, different reporting methods (life-table mean patency, life-table 50% patency, arithmetic mean patency, etc) applied to the exact same database can result in dramatically different conclusions; Hodges et al (23) showed that autogenous fistulas could be interpreted to have patencies equal to those of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts, shorter than PTFE grafts, or twice as long as PTFE grafts, depending on the method of data analysis. Suggested standards for reporting the results of arterial revascularization have been published previously by the Journal of Vascular Surgery (24,25) and the Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (26,27). Reporting standards for acute and chronic thromboembolic venous disease have also been suggested (28). These reporting standards are obviously an imperfect fit for dialysis access interventions. To our knowledge, there has been no publication suggesting uniform reporting standards for dialysis access revascularization despite calls for their establishment (23,29). The purpose of this document is to recommend standards to be used for study design and reporting of percutaneous interventions for permanent hemodialysis access. The Table summarizes these standards in an abbreviated format.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Training standards for physicians performing peripheral angioplasty and other percutaneous peripheral vascular interventions. A statement for health professionals from the Special Writing Group of the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, and Clinical Cardiology, the American Heart Association.

PERCUTANEOUS transluminal angioplasty of peripheral, renal, and visceral arteries has been in widespread clinical use for more than a decade, and it is estimated that approximately 100,000 of these procedures are performed annually in the United States. In recent years controversy has developed among the various medical disciplines about who is qualified to perform percutaneous transluminal ang...

متن کامل

Reporting standards for clinical evaluation of new peripheral arterial revascularization devices.

Endoluminal revascularization devices (balloon angioplasty, atherectomy, laser recanalization, stents) have typically been evaluated in small, poorly controlled series. This has led to overly slow acceptance of some techniques (1) because of doubts by the medical community regarding long-term durability of balloon percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) versus surgery, and overly rapid acce...

متن کامل

General principles for evaluation of new interventional technologies and devices. Technology Assessment Committee.

INTERVENTIONAL therapies and devices have become increasingly accepted in recent years. It is the purpose of the Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) to propose guidelines for the scientific evaluation of new technology. This article is a statement of general principles of research and is intended to be the background for subsequent standards produced...

متن کامل

Comparison of percutaneous versus open surgical techniques for placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter in children: A randomized clinical trial

  Background: This research compares the outcomes of percutaneous technique and open surgical peritoneal dialysis catheter placement in children.   Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, between 2010 and 2011,a total of 35 pediatric uremic patients were enrolled and randomized into two study groups. Follow up data included duration of operation (minute), duration of hospitalization (days...

متن کامل

Chronic Kidney Disease Progression and Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Cardiac Catheterization—A Population‐Controlled Study

BACKGROUND Studies of kidney disease associated with cardiac catheterization typically rely on billing records rather than laboratory data. We examined the associations between percutaneous coronary interventions, acute kidney injury, and chronic kidney disease progression using comprehensive Veterans Affairs clinical and laboratory databases. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients undergoing percutane...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR

دوره 10 10  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1999